To whom can the deviation authority be further sub-delegated by an army commanding general?

The statement that the deviation authority shall not be further sub-delegated emphasizes the importance of maintaining accountability and clarity of authority within military operations. This ensures that decision-making remains in the hands of those who have been specifically designated to hold that authority, which prevents potential confusion or miscommunication regarding who is responsible for deviations from established protocols or safety measures.

In military structures, delegation of authority is common; however, certain critical roles, especially those involving safety and operational integrity, are intentionally restricted to prevent dilution of responsibility. This measure ensures that the commanding general can maintain control over significant decisions that could impact the safety and effectiveness of operations. Hence, keeping this authority centralized safeguards against unauthorized or unintended consequences that could arise from further delegation.

While other roles such as staff officers, commanders of equal rank, or safety officers may have their own distinct responsibilities, only the commanding general is vested with the specific authority to approve deviations, reinforcing the principle of clear command lines and responsibility within military operations.