As the OIC, if your commanding officer wants to use high explosives with mortars during an exercise, what should you inform him?

The statement regarding not having been assigned a high-hazard impact area for the exercise is essential because it addresses a crucial safety concern. High explosives, particularly when used with mortars, necessitate specific safety measures and designated areas to mitigate the risks associated with their use. These locations are often established to contain any potential effects of explosive ordnance and ensure that safety protocols are effectively implemented.

A high-hazard impact area is designated to safeguard personnel, equipment, and surrounding communities from the hazards that come with using high explosives. By informing the commanding officer of the lack of such an area, it underscores the necessity for proper planning and adherence to safety regulations. This is integral to maintaining safety standards on the range and ensuring compliance with relevant directives.

Conversely, the other options do not adequately address the critical issue of safety in relation to using high explosives. For example, while having clearance from Range Control is important, it doesn't mitigate the lack of a suitable impact area. Similarly, weather conditions may play a role in operational decisions, but they are not the primary concern if the necessary infrastructure for safe explosive usage is absent. Lastly, while waiting for additional authorization from higher command could be prudent in certain contexts, it doesn't directly resolve the immediate safety implications regarding the exercise at